Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Global Reinforced Plastics Industry[2016/09/27]
-
Creating a loop of recyclers throughout North America[2016/11/16]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
Microsoft issues battery fixes for Surface Pro 3 via newest firmware update[2016/11/10]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
The cost of plastic packaging[2016/10/18]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]